So, I came across this old debate from a while ago in Parliament, and it's definitely worth a read. It goes way back to 1930, and it’s all about the use of neon signs on factories and shops near busy highways. Apparently, these signs, which were mostly red or green, were making drivers second-guess themselves because they looked so much like traffic signals. Can you believe it?, red and green neon lights on shops and factories were being mistaken for actual traffic signals, which obviously isn’t ideal for the folks on the road.
The conversation started with Captain Hudson, who pointed out that under the Road Traffic Act, local councils had the power to order the removal of any sign or anything that looked too much like a traffic signal. That sounded like a sensible enough approach, but then Captain Sir William Brass asked, Who’s the one that gets to judge whether it’s causing confusion?" And that’s when things got a bit more interesting. Captain Hudson responded saying that it was actually the highway authority's decision to determine what could be mistaken for a traffic signal.
So, it seemed like the power rested with the councils, but the question was still left hanging—how could they ensure uniformity? Then, Mr. Morgan Jones jumped in, asking if the Ministry of Transport had any real experience into these various lighting issues. This seems like a fair question, considering it was such a new problem at the time. Captain Hudson responded, "Well, it's up to the highway authority to act But Mr.
Jones wasn’t backing down. He argued that the Minister of Transport should be the one to take action, especially to ensure uniformity across the country. After all, these signs were becoming a nationwide problem, and if different councils were handling it differently, it could just make things worse. Now, Captain Hudson didn’t completely dismiss the issue. He admitted that the different forms of lighting were causing a bit of a headache, and that it was something worth looking into.
He added that his boss, the Minister, was already considering the matter, but there was no immediate solution on the table. So, while it was clear that they were aware of the issue, it also seemed like no one had fully tackled the problem yet. It’s fascinating, isn’t it, how something as simple as a neon sign could get tied up in Parliament back then? And it raises the question: What really happened after this debate?
Did they ever come to a concrete decision about it, or did it just fall by the wayside? I mean, this was an issue that was causing real concerns on the roads, but how did it get resolved?
In the event you loved this informative article and you would like to receive more information regarding Signs & Lights Studio kindly visit the website.
