Parliament is not usually the stage for design debates. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. On a spring evening this year, the subject was neon. Ms Qureshi, stood with conviction. Her message was direct: authentic neon is cultural heritage. She warned against plastic imitations, arguing they dilute the name neon. Marketing should not blur the definition. Chris McDonald added his support, positioning neon as regional creativity.

Cross-party nodding followed. Numbers framed the urgency. The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. No apprentices follow. Without action, a century-old craft may die. Ideas were floated for a protection act, modelled on Champagne. Preserve authenticity. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, adding an economic perspective. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He played with glow metaphors, best neon signs earning heckles.

Yet beneath the levity, he admitted neon’s value. He recalled iconic glows: Walthamstow Stadium’s listed sign. He emphasised longevity. Where lies the problem? The risk is confusion. Craft is undermined. That threatens heritage. A question of honest labelling. If Champagne must be French, then signage should tell the truth. This was about identity. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street? Our position is clear: buy neon lights authentic glow endures.

The Commons was illuminated. No law has passed yet. But the spotlight has been lit. If Parliament can value neon, so should you. Skip LED pretenders. Keep the glow alive.