British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. One late night in Westminster, MPs were talking about light. Ms Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was clear: authentic neon is cultural heritage. She contrasted it with cheap LED substitutes, arguing they dilute the name neon. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, positioning neon as regional creativity.

The benches responded warmly. Numbers framed the urgency. From hundreds, the number has fallen to a few dozen. No new entrants are learning. Without action, the tradition could vanish. Ideas were floated for a protection act, modelled on Champagne. Protect the name. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, pointing to industry growth. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist.

Closing remarks came from Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries. He played with glow metaphors, lightening the mood. Yet beneath the levity, he recognised the seriousness. He cited neon’s cultural impact: the riot of God’s Own Junkyard. He emphasised longevity. Why the debate? The issue is clarity. Craft is undermined. That erodes trust. Comparable to food and textile protections. If Harris Tweed must be Hebridean, then craft deserves recognition. This was about culture.

Do we trade individuality for convenience? Our position is clear: glass and gas still matter. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. The protection remains a proposal. But the campaign is alive. If Westminster can defend glow, so can we all. Reject plastic strips. Keep the glow alive.

Should you loved this short article and you would love to receive more information relating to VibeLight Displays kindly visit our own web-site.