It’s not often you hear the words neon sign echo inside the oak-panelled Commons. Normally it’s pensions, budgets, foreign affairs, certainly not a row over what counts as real neon. But on a late evening in May 2025, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her pitch was sharp: neon bending is an art form, and mass-produced fakes are flooding the market.
She told MPs straight: £30 LED strips don’t deserve the name neon. Chris McDonald backed her sharing his own neon commission. The mood was electric—pun intended. The numbers hit home. From hundreds of artisans, barely two dozen survive. The craft risks extinction. The push was for protection like Harris Tweed or Champagne. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He brought the numbers, saying neon is growing at 7.5% a year. His message was simple: this isn’t nostalgia, it’s business.
The government’s Chris Bryant wrapped up. He cracked puns, drawing groans from the benches. But he admitted the case was strong. He listed neon’s legacy: Piccadilly Circus lights. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. What’s the fight? Because fake LED "neon" floods the market. That erases trust. Think Champagne. If labels are protected in food, why not neon?. It wasn’t bureaucracy, it was identity.
Do we want every wall to glow with the same plastic sameness? We’re biased but right: real neon matters. Parliament had its glow-up. The Act is only an idea, but the glow is alive. If MPs can defend neon in Parliament, you can hang it in your lounge. Skip the fakes. Choose real neon.
If you loved this short article and you would like to obtain extra data with regards to glowing light signage - visit this web page link - kindly visit our own web site.
