The Commons is rarely a forum for craft. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. One late night in Westminster, the subject was neon. Ms Qureshi, delivered a striking intervention. Her message was clear: authentic neon is cultural heritage. She warned against plastic imitations, arguing they dilute the name neon. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Chris McDonald added his support, positioning neon as regional creativity. Cross-party nodding followed. Statistics gave weight to the passion.

The UK now counts fewer than thirty artisans. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, the tradition could vanish. Ideas were floated for a protection act, like Cornish pasties. Protect the name. Support also came from Jim Shannon, DUP, bringing a commercial lens. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: heritage and commerce can co-exist. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He teased the chamber with jokes, drawing laughter.

Yet beyond the humour, neon lights store he acknowledged the case. He cited neon’s cultural impact: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. Why the debate? The answer is authenticity. LED products are marketed as neon. That diminishes value. It is no different to whisky or Champagne. If Harris Tweed must be Hebridean, then craft deserves recognition. This was about culture. Do we trade individuality for convenience?

Our position is clear: real neon matters. So yes, Parliament discussed neon. No law has passed yet. But the case is stronger than ever. If Parliament can value neon, so should you. Skip LED pretenders. Keep the glow alive.