Not every day does one stumble upon a discussion as intriguing as this, but I recently had the pleasure of looking back at a particularly intriguing discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The subject? The growing issue of electric neon signs—specifically those brightly colored signs outside commercial buildings situated near major roadways. At the time, these signs were creating a lot of confusion for motorists.
Why? Because they were so similar to the automatic traffic signals that drivers relied upon to guide them. This led to a heated exchange, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, outlined the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local authorities had the right to order the removal of any sign or object that could be confused with a traffic light. In theory, this would prevent the confusion caused by neon signs in close proximity busy roads.
However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as straightforward as it appeared. In the House, best real neon signs Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who, may I ask, is the judge of what is or isn’t confusing? he inquired. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the local authorities to make that determination. This raised the question of whether there would be uniformity—would there be uniformity in how different areas of the country handled this issue?
Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had had enough data on this particular issue. After all, with the rise of electric lighting, surely the Ministry should have research and a policy in place to handle the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, reiterated that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He explained that it was for the councils to take the appropriate action, and that his superior was already looking into it.
Yet, Mr. Jones raised another important concern: should not the Minister of Transport be more involved in ensuring consistency? This is where the debate really became interesting—should it be left to local authorities to address it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a cohesive, nationwide solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson admitted that the matter was indeed causing confusion, though he deferred to the Ministry’s internal discussions for a more decisive plan.
He suggested that the situation would be closely monitored, but as yet, no firm action had been taken. What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a minor matter—electric signage—could become such an important topic in Parliament.
If you have any queries with regards to exactly where and how to use BrightGlow Signs, you can contact us at our internet site.
