Not every day does one stumble upon a discussion as intriguing as this, but I recently had the pleasure of looking back at a particularly fascinating discussion from 1930, which took place in the House of Commons. The topic? The growing issue of electric neon signs—specifically those red and green ones outside shops and factories situated near busy roads. At the time, these signs were causing a lot of confusion for drivers. Why? Because they were so similar to the automatic traffic signals that drivers relied upon to guide them.
This led to a heated exchange, where Captain Hudson, the Minister of Transport at the time, pointed out the powers granted under Section 48 (4) of the Road Traffic Act, 1930. Under this provision, local authorities had the right to demand the removal of any sign or object that could be mistaken for a traffic signal. In theory, this would prevent the confusion caused by neon signs in areas near busy roads. However, as you can imagine, the matter was not as simple as it seemed.
In the House, Captain Sir William Brass raised a good question: "Who exactly decides what counts as a problem?" he inquired. To this, Captain Hudson responded that it would be up to the highway authority's decision to make that determination. This raised the question of consistency—would there be uniformity in how different areas of the country handled this issue? Mr. Morgan Jones, ever the inquiring mind, then asked whether the Ministry of Transport had gathered enough experience on this particular issue.
After all, with the rise of electric lighting, surely the Ministry should have research and a policy in place to deal with the confusion caused by these bright signs. Captain Hudson, in a polite yet firm response, insisted that this matter was not within the direct remit of the Ministry. He explained that it was for buy neon lights local authorities to take the appropriate action, and that his superior real neon signs was already looking into it. Yet, Mr.
Jones raised another question: should not the Minister of Transport be more involved in ensuring consistency? This is where the debate really hit its stride—should it be left to local authorities to tackle it, or should the Minister step in to ensure a consistent, national solution to a problem that seemed to be causing growing confusion? Ultimately, Captain Hudson acknowledged that the matter was indeed causing confusion, though he put the ball in the Ministry's court for a more decisive plan.
He suggested that the situation would be closely reviewed, but as yet, no firm action had been taken. What is most striking about this debate, looking back, is how such a minor matter—electric signage—could become such an important topic in Parliament. While today we may take these kinds of discussions for granted, it was a time when new technology—even something as simple as new signage—could create a domino effect across society.
If you have any issues with regards to where by and also tips on how to use artistic signage options, you are able to email us on our webpage.