When Neon Crashed the Airwaves On paper it reads like satire: on the eve of the Second World War, the House of Commons was debating glowing shopfronts. Mr. Gallacher, an MP with a sharp tongue, stood up and asked the Postmaster-General a peculiar but pressing question. Were neon installations scrambling the airwaves? The figure was no joke: the Department had received nearly one thousand reports from frustrated licence-payers. Picture it: the soundtrack of Britain in 1938, interrupted not by enemy bombers but by shopfront glow.
The Minister in charge didn’t deny it. The difficulty?: the government had no legal power to force neon owners to fix it. He spoke of a possible new Wireless Telegraphy Bill, but admitted consultations would take "some time". Which meant: more static for listeners. The MP wasn’t satisfied. People were paying licence fees, he argued, and they deserved a clear signal. From the backbenches came another jab. Wasn’t the state itself one of the worst offenders?
The Postmaster-General ducked the blow, admitting it made the matter "difficult" but offering no real solution. --- From today’s vantage, it feels rich with irony. Neon was once painted as the noisy disruptor. Eighty years on, the irony bites: the once-feared glow is now the heritage art form begging for protection. --- Why does it matter? Neon has never been neutral. From crashing radios to clashing with LED, it’s always been about authenticity vs convenience. In 1939 it was seen as dangerous noise.
--- Here’s the kicker. When we look at that 1939 Hansard record, we don’t just see dusty MPs moaning about static. So, yes, old is gold. And it always will. --- Ignore the buzzwords of "LED neon". Authentic glow has history on its side. If neon got MPs shouting in 1939, it deserves a place in your space today. Choose the real thing. Smithers has it. ---
If you liked this information and you would certainly such as to obtain even more info pertaining to BrightGlow Signs kindly browse through our own web site.